The Built & Individual Environment Review, Volume 3, Special Concern 1, 2010
Evaluating Exploration Methodology in Construction
Panas, A. and Pantouvakis, L. P.
[email protected] ntua. grms and [email protected] ntua. gr
Centre intended for Construction Advancement, Department of Construction Anatomist and Supervision, Faculty of Civil Executive, National Technological University of Athens, Portugal
Despite the large number of published papers in the area of construction production, a critical report on contemporary considering with a discussion of the significance to current researchers can be rarely tried. As such, this kind of paper investigates the subject relying on published documents in main peer-reviewed publications during the last 10 years. Eighty-nine documents published in both building journals and broader administration science magazines have been analysed. Three wide-ranging classifications were used for summarizing the strategies adopted inside the papers: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method research approaches. The study taxonomy further more identified three major areas based on every single study's analysis focus: Archival studies, scientific research and simulation proposals. In terms of the methodological framework followed, three main types have been recognised: Experimental frameworks, data collection techniques and modelling plans. A methodological framework can be developed after the evaluation's results and its particular implementation with an actual research study is illustrated. The main summary is that the number of the research methodology in released journal paperwork has been a great intuitive decision, mainly relating upon the researcher's ontological and epistemological stance. Yet , general recommendations on the choice of the most appropriate strategy in relation to the study aims and objectives are often proposed.
Keywords: Construction, Technique, Productivity, Exploration
The investigation methodology includes the rationale plus the philosophical presumptions that underlie a particular research (Dainty, 2008). The choice of study strategy considerably influences the specification of the research strategies that are implemented for examining a problem and determines the study design, particularly the framework for collecting, analysing and interpreting data (ibid. ). The establishment of the most appropriate methodology for construction research is a current subject matter of concern. This is certainly corroborated by special concern of the Journal of Development Engineering and Management (Volume 1, Issue 1) about research methodologies for Structure which simply appeared at the beginning of 2010. My old somewhat put approach to the niche can be traced back in the mid to past due 1990's using a series of papers appearing in Construction Administration and Economics (Volumes 13-16). The review of all those and some other supplementary options (from relevant papers which did not come in the above mentioned journals and periods) has led to a number of questions associated with construction managing research methodological issues: Precisely what are the most suitable
The Developed & Human being Environment Assessment, Volume a few, Special Concern 1, 2010
criteria for selecting the research method? How can the rigour and robustness of a research efforts be examined? What are the present trends?
The above and related questions include formed the motivation pertaining to the research described in this newspaper. More specifically, the objective of this paper is to present answers to the above inquiries, with a particular focus on analysis related to development productivity (CP). The discipline of CP is an expedient study area because the complex and flexible nature of the subject has led to the rendering of multiple method strategies. As such, this study is exploring the different views for measuring or calculating construction production. The main purpose is to capitalise on the craze towards methodological rigour and comprehensiveness simply by...
References: Abowitz, D. A. and Toole, T. Meters. (2010) Blended method study: fundamental problems of design and style, validity, and
reliability in construction research
AbouRizk, S., Knowles, G. and Hermann, U. 3rd there’s r. (2001) Estimating labor development rates to get industrial
Al-Hussein, M., Niaz, M. A., Yu, L. and Betty, H. (2006) Integrating 3D visualization and simulation pertaining to tower
raie operations about construction sites
Al-Sudairi, A. A. (2007) Evaluating the result of construction process characteristics to the applicability of trim
Anson, M., Tang, S. L. and Ying, K. C. (2002) Measurement of the functionality of ready mixed concreting
resources while data to get system ruse
Bernold, T. E. (2007) Quantitative evaluation of backhoe operator skill. Journal of Construction Executive
and Supervision, 133(11), 889-899.
Bernold, M. E. and Lee, Big t. S. (2010) Experimental research in structure. Journal of Construction Anatomist
and Managing, 136(1), 26-35.
Chan, S. W. and Kaka, A. (2007) Efficiency improvements: understand the workforce awareness of
Chao, L. C. (2001) Determining earth-moving operation capacity by simply neural network-based simulation with physical
Cheng, Capital t. M. and Feng, C. W. (2003) An effective ruse mechanism to get construction businesses.
Cottrell, M. S. (2006) Contractor procedure improvement intended for enhancing construction productivity. Diary of
Building Engineering and Management, 132(2), 189-196.
Coutermarsch, B. (2007) Velocity a result of vehicle rolling resistance in sand. Record of Terramechanics, 44,
Couto, J. P. and Teixeira, M. C. (2005) Using linear model intended for learning contour effect on highrise floor construction.
Crawford, L. and Vogl, B. (2006) Measuring output in the construction industry. Building Research &
Information, 34(3), 208-219.
Dai, J., Goodrum, P. M. and Maloney, W. Farreneheit. (2009) Building craft workers' perceptions with the factors
affecting their efficiency
Dainty, A. (2008) Methodological pluralism in construction administration research. In: A. Dark night and M.
Doloi, L. (2008) Using AHP in improving construction productivity by a management perspective.
Dunlop, P. and Smith, T. D. (2004) Planning, estimation and production in the lean concrete serve. Engineering,
Development and Architectural Management, 11(1), 55-64.
Dunston, P. H., Savage, M. M. and Mannering, F. L. (2000) Weekend drawing a line under for development of asphalt overlay
about urban freeway
Edwards, M. J. and Holt, G. D. (2000) ESTIVATE: an auto dvd unit for determining excavator efficiency and result
The Built & Human Environment Review, Volume 3, Exceptional Issue 1, 2010
El-Rayes, E. and Mosehli, O. (2001) Impact of rainfall on the productivity of highway structure. Journal of
Construction Executive and Managing, 127(2), 125-131.
Enshassi, A., Mohamed, T., Mayer, L. and Abed, K. (2007) Benchmarking brickwork labor productivity.
Ezeldin, A. S. and Sharara, L. M. (2006) Neural sites for price the production of concreting activities.
Geniuses, R. and Liu, A. (2003) Study methods for construction. Blackwell, UK.
Flood, I. and Issa, R. R. A. (2010) Empirical modeling methodologies for construction. Diary of Development
Engineering and Management, 136(1), 36-48.
Goodrum, P. Meters., Zhai, M. and Yasin, M., Farreneheit. (2009) Romantic relationship between within material technology and
Graham, D. and Smith, T. D. (2004) Estimating the productivity of cyclic construction operations employing casebased thinking. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 18, 17-28.
Graham, L. Deb., Smith, T. D. and Dunlop, P. (2005) Lognormal distribution provides an optimum portrayal
of the tangible delivery and placement process
Grau, D., Caldas, C. H., Haas, C. T., Goodrum, G. M. and Gong, M. (2009) Examining the impact of materials
checking technologies on construction craft productivity
Grix, J. (2001) Demystifying postgraduate research: Via MA to PhD. College or university of Greater london Press,
Hajjar, D. and AbouRizk, S. M. (2002) Specific modeling technique for development simulation. Record of
Development Engineering and Management, 128(2), 174-185.
Hanna, A. S i9000., Chang, C. K., Lackney, J. A. and Sullivan, K. T. (2007) Impact of overmanning on physical and
linen metal labor productivity
Hanna, A. H., Chang, C. K., Sullivan, K. Big t. and Lackney, J. A. (2008) Impact of shift work on labor productivity
intended for labor intensive service provider
Hanna, A. S., Lotfallah, W. B. and Shelter, M. L. (2002) Statistical-fuzzy approach to quantify cumulative effect of
Hanna, A. H., Russell, M. S., Gotzion, T. Watts. and Nordheim, E. Sixth is v. (1999a) Effects of modify orders about labor
efficiency for mechanised construction
Hanna, A. T., Russell, T. S., Nordheim, E. Versus. and Brugginnk, M. T. (1999b) Influence of alter orders about labor
effectiveness for electric powered construction
Hanna, A. T., Taylor, C. S. and Sullivan, K. T. (2005) Impact of extended overtime, however, on development labor
Harriss, C. (1998) So why research without theory is usually not exploration: A reply to Seymour, Criminal and Rooke.
Hassan, M. M. and Gruber, S i9000. (2008) Ruse of cement paving businesses on Interstate-74. Journal of
The Built & Human Environment Review, Volume 3, Unique Issue you, 2010
Building Engineering and Management, 134(1), 2-9.
Hegab, M. Y. and Johnson, G. 3rd there’s r. (2007) Delay time evaluation in microtunneling projects. Log of Development
Engineering and Management, 133(2), 191-195.
Hong, Z., Shi, J. T. and W tamtym miejscu, C. M. (2002) Aesthetic modeling and simulation intended for construction operations.
Huang, Ur. Y. and Hsieh, W. C. (2005) A construction simulation program (COMSim) with object-oriented
Huang, R. Con., Chen, J. J. & Sun, E. S. (2004) Planning team formwork operations for building construction
Hughes, W. (1994) The PhD in construction management. In: Proceedings from the 10th Annual ARCOM
Convention, 14-16 Sept, Loughborough.
Kannan, G. and Vorster, M. (2000) Progress an experience data source for pick up truck loading operations. Journal